Manuscript review
Recommendation
1.Publish after minor changes
2.Publish unaltered
3.Review again after major changes
4.Reject (Paper is not of sufficient quality or novelty to be published in this Journal)
5.Reject (Paper is seriously flawed; do not encourage resubmission.)
A.evaluation
1.How do you evaluate the manuscript?
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
B.Content
1.Is this paper of original value?
Yes, definitely
To some extent
Hardly
I cannot judge this
2. Is this paper scientifically correct?
Yes
Probably, although all details have not been checked
Doubtful
3. To what extent will the results be useful for other scientists?
Large
Average
Small
4. How would you characterize the level of the paper?
For experts only
Useful for people working in related fields
Understandable also for nonspecialists
Superficial
6.Is the bibliography reasonable?
Yes
After minor modifications
No
C.Presentation
1.Is this title adequate?
Yes
No
2.Does the abstract give a correct description of the content?
Yes
No
3.Is the general organization of the paper acceptable?
Yes
No
4.With respect to the content, is the length of the paper reasonable?
Yes
No, should be increased
No, should be decreased
5.How do you rate readability?
Good
Some effort needed
Large effort needed